Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?
Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?
Behooved it not the Christ to suffer these things, and to enter into his glory?
Was it not necessary for the Christ to go through these things, and to come into his glory?
Ought not Christ to suffer these things, and to enter into his glory?
Didn't the Christ have to suffer these things and to enter into his glory?"
Behoved it not the Christ to suffer these things, and to enter into his glory?
Ought not Christ to have suffered - Ουχι εδει παθειν τον Χριστον, Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer. This was the way in which sin must be expiated, and, without this, no soul could have been saved. The suffering Messiah is he alone by whom Israel and the world can be saved.
Ought not Christ ... - Ought not the "Messiah." Was there not evidence that he would do it? and was it not indispensable that he should, in order to fulfil the prophecies? The "necessity" of his suffering these things referred to "here" was that it was foretold that he "would." The reason why it was predicted, and why it was necessary that it should occur, was that it was proper that God should manifest his justice, and do honor to his law, and secure the due regard for his government, while he pardoned the guilty.
24:26 Ought not Christ - If he would redeem man, and fulfil the prophecies concerning him, to have suffered these things? - These very sufferings which occasion your doubts, are the proofs of his being the Messiah. And to enter into his glory - Which could be done no other way.